Monday, 28 November 2011

Where I am in the process of my inquiry (Entry 2)

14/11/11
Gathering data for my inquiry was a useful learning process. I discovered that by explaining my topic to N.McGowan, N.Less, P.Nottingham and M.Iles in a group discussion at campus sessions allowed me to analyse the choices being made about conducting my inquiry.  Students were able to ask me questions regarding my inquiry and offer their opinions based on their experiences. This process was valuable as it offered me different perspectives from my own.
Individuals on BAPP directed me to information that related to my inquiry which proved to be of great assistance. When researching data, there seemed to be vast amounts about how to delegate in an organisation, but very little about delegation specifically in the arts sector. This was the primary reason why I chose my inquiry topic. I was aware that it would benefit me and others within the arts.
The strategy I used for acquiring secondary data was surfing Google search bar. I searched online archives of arts organisations, web sites and arts related newspapers and journals.  I also had access to Middlesex university library and online library facilities.  Another tool I used to gain data for my inquiry was an interview process.
The availability of individuals involved in the interview process resulted in my inquiry slowing down momentum. It was a challenge coordinating a time for some of the participants to be interviewed due to the hectic nature of their job. Prior to the interview I was aware of this and put the contingency measure of informing two additional individuals that they may be required for my investigation.
In my inquiry I wanted to compare, contrast and validate results from a team of two individuals (manager and their subordinate) from a private, public and volunteer arts sector. When creating a contingency plan there was a scenario that I was unprepared for. One was that possibility that if a manager was unavailable, I may have had to find another manager AND their subordinate from a different organisation within in their specific sector to interview. Fortunately I did not have to resort to a contingency plan.
When conducting one-on-one interviews, candidates were privy to viewing the questions that I was going to ask prior to interview. This proved to be useful as it gave them a longer period to formulate their opinions.  If conducting interviews again I would prefer to do them all in person as I had to re start two interviews conducted via web cam due to bad audio and Internet connection cutting out. I also believe that in person an interviewer can build a relationship with their interviewee, making the interviewee feel more comfortable enabling a free flow of information.
On reflection if given more time, another inquiry tool I would use for this inquiry is observation. As a performer I am aware that I learn and retain a lot of information from visuals. I would also like a longer period of time to acquire a larger sample of participants so I could make more valid generalisations. This inquiry has made me want to analyse other managerial skills that are need for an arts manager.

No comments:

Post a Comment